I’ve become an NPR
junkie. A weird way to put it I suppose since public broadcasting is
more wholesome than detrimental. You know that song, Video Killed the
Radio Star. The argument is that television has made radio less
popular. Since it adds the visual dimension to media. But in my
opinions, pure audio is able to accomplish things that televised
broadcast can not. For one thing audio is making a big comeback, now
that the portability of XM radios and MP3 players are getting so big.
So I find myself
listen to music, news, and radio programs while I drive, work at my
desk, do chores around the house, and even now typing on the computer.
If I were watching TV I have to draw away much more of my attention to
the TV screen. In this age of multi-tasking, audio media intake seems
like the way to go. And what’s more you can more easily incorporate it
in your life events, which you can’t do as easily with TV. For example
I heard on the news that users of iPod are sometimes amazed how the
player seems to have “a mind of it’s own” by playing the right choice
of music at the appropriate time. Now I’ve witnessed this sort of
phenomenon myself already on my computer’s Winamp. To me it’s chance
coincidence. But it’s insanely cool when it happens. But if you make
things more portable, you can easily carry a soundtrack of your life
with you. You are repairing your car and the Mission Impossible theme
plays. You take a test and have the Jeopardy tune in the backdrop. You
race your friend to the front door and to the music of Chariots of
Fire… but for that to be appropriate you race your friend in slowww…
mmoootionnn…
Art can imitate life
even more so now. The possibility exists for us to more easily
orchestrate scenes. Well not really, since we don’t have control over
people’s action. You don’t really have a director’s role. It’s not like
you can point your finger and have some hottie come on to you. Nor can
we snap our fingers and have everyone in the background dance with us
in sync while we sing a catchy number. We’re probably better off that
way. Real life needs to preserve it’s reality.
So I’ve been helping
folks with their websites recently as well as redo my own. It’s good to
get work those html fingers again. And recently I’ve playing the
archived files of Wait, Wait, Don’t tell me in the background while I
work on the sites.
http://www.npr.org/programs/waitwait/
But even then I have to pause it a while to get some quiet time. Or if I want some concentration.
Also on NPR today was a very amusing news broadcast. Follow this link and click [listen].
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4225769
Now there are two
interesting theories here. One is that we assume the Y chromosome with
80 genes use to have the same number as the X chromosome 1,000 genes
hundreds of millions of years ago. A hypothesis can be extrapolated
that the Y chromosome will evolve into nothingness millions of years in
the future. Which could mean the end of the male gender.
<gasp> Or at least for sexual reproduction.
<double gasp>
Then there is the
other theory that’s less disparaging. In fact gives hope to the male
race. What’s cool is that the Y chromosome is a giant palindrome. And
that if the chromosome encounters any dangers, as errors in
replication, then it can easily find it’s mirror image for the fix. Any
threat to Y's existence can be neutralized. The females with two X
chromosomes have a similar mechanism, where errors in one X is fixed by
taking a sequence from the other. Now, what’s cool is that this
inherent difference in males and females could explain the differences
in our mentality as well as physicality. I also think it’s nifty that I
can say I have a palindrome in my core being. And it’s a male ego trip
to think of our Y chromosome to be special.
I just like the evidence supporting that both the male and female gender live on.
A big cheer for sexuality. Woohoo!
Recent Comments